Jews are part of the Semitic gene pool. The same as Arabs. The Jews descended from Jacob and the Arabs descended from his brother Ishmael.

They were from Mesopotamia. The Indo-Europeans meanwhile are from the steppes of Ukraine.

Jews have too high of an IQ to be white.

@Strong There is no doubt that a Jew in a strong household will be smarter than a Jew in a weak household. Environment does effect IQ. But IQ also effects environment. Maybe the reason why blacks have more weak households than Jews is because of their lower average IQ?

Edited 8/2/2017 22:02:25

Thanks Tabby.

But when I moved here I was astonished at the lifestyle here ( Arabian Peninsula Arabs are called Khaleejis.) You have not meta Khaleeji Tabby, how can you say they have higher IQ's than blacks when I lived with both. Khaleejis are generally extremely stupid and their only concern is cars and materialistic things. There are a few that are smart and those are the ones that rule the country and own companies and businesses. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RfhCGKdQ2c <--- Just look at that, this is the majority of the Khaleeji population. THAT is what they're interested in. VERY few are interested in STEM things, for fuck's sake they all were nothing 50 years ago.

@Strong High T levels leads to weak families. Weak families leads to lower average IQ. lower IQ leads to weaker families and so on.

I don't care how the cycle got started. That is in the past. We need to look to the future and

A) find a way to stop the cycle or
B) find a way to phase out sub-Saharan Africans (like sterilization)

No, it isn't like the West where you need the entire nation to be on the same page as the leader. They did not build anything!
They all had great leaders that single-handled ly transformed their nations from deserts to urban cities! Their leaders did all the hard work, the infrastructure was not built 100% by them but help from the West haha if you didn't know. For example, look at Sheikh Zayed he actually transformed the UAE from a vast desert to.. something great compared to what it was. See what I'm saying? It's not the people it's the leaders that change the countries here in the Gulf.

This is a GREAT video on the failure of arab militaries: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZk4Yu42g0I

Edited 8/2/2017 22:17:05

Of course, all people that immigrate to America are people who are well not stupid they have vision since America is the land of opportunity for them.
What I'm trying to say is that people who immigrate to America from other countries that are not refugees usually are not stupid.

And yes, Once the Arabs were great but now I'm telling you from first-hand experience their youth and young men are fucking stupid and it's sad to see how hard their elders paved the road for them and to see them waste it all away.

If race is a social construct then why can't I get sickle cell anemia, a disease that only affects black people?

You can get it too actually if one of your ancestors had it. It has nothing to do with skin colour. The reason why it's so common in Sub-Sahara Africa is that is kind of gives them a resistence to Malaria. Thus people with said disease are more likely to survive and reproduce.

^^ There is a 15 point IQ difference between whites and blacks. This is scientifically measurable and has remained constant.

I would like to point out that most IQ-Tests are created by well educated (most likely) white people. As far as I know in German speaking countries there is an unintentional bias towards people coming from richer families. Since it's not certain how much genes affect IQ, it's safe to assume that people with better education have better results.

Blacks almost never curbed their own peafowlish traits which caused them to devolve.

If you mean with "peafolism" birthrate, then I would like to remind you that birthrates were similar high in western countries centuries back. It has nothing to do with race, but with other factors. Namely job, family and environment. Farmers who need kids to work on the field with an already high infant mortality rate will make sure they have as many children as possible. To ensure they will able to continue even in future genrations.
Even in western countries this trend is there. Rural families have usually more children than families living in urban surroundings. Now does that mean they have lower IQ? Most certainly not. They just happen to have a reason to have (more) kids.

^Tabby will just blame it on the highly religious past.

If IQ tests are invented by white people then why do Jews and Asians have higher IQs?

"You can get it too actually if one of your ancestors had it."

Well then its a good thing none of my ancestors were black.

If IQ tests are invented by white people then why do Jews and Asians have higher IQs?

Education.

To a certain degree yes. But high IQ parents create strong families and take an active role in their child's education. Low IQ parents don't and so their children develop low IQ and low IQ parents and the cycle continues.

Low IQ people will always be able to out breed the high-IQ people. Sterilization is a solution.

Edited 8/2/2017 23:19:40

Low IQ people will always be able to out breed the high-IQ people. Sterilization is a solution.

Why sterilise them? Why not simply kill them instead? Has the same effect, but is cheaper. Even the Nazis were smarter, because they used their workforce while executing their genocide. Or would you be too afraid with what you have done? If you call for an action, atleast have the balls to execute it effectively.

^Mass killings is only viable once
1) The media is completely controlled by the executive and can hide the genocide.
2) Freedom of the Press is abolished
3) Freedom to Protest is abolished
4) The populace you are killing has been completely disarmed.
5) Right to a trial of your peers and consul are abolished

I am against all 5 of these steps. There may be more but the steps necessary to genocide a populace are unhealthy and once the genocide is finished the leader will use these new-found powers to hold onto power, spread corruption, and generally make the people's lives shitty.

Sterilization, especially at birth, is not unconstitutional.

Sterilization, especially at birth, is not unconstitutional.

Which constitution?

Sterilization, especially at birth, is not unconstitutional.

Rounding up a specific ethnic group into concentration camps isn't specifically unconstitutional either, but that's only because the Founding Fathers didn't anticipate people in later centuries would try to do it.

Constitutional=/=Moral

Besides, I'm fairly sure sterilizing children still violates several federal and state laws.

>Implying mass sterilization would not cause a huge reaction

Mass sterilization? Why is that? Because you can't get a girl and people you call ''dumb'' get partners way more than you? You are just jealous and your hatred for ''dumb'' people probably got manipulated into full-blown racism. I am sorry for you.

The cringe in this thread is endless.

^ Indeed.

I have a girlfriend. She is 1 year older than me with Serbian blood. I can't be racists. I am dating a slav.