Not really. Old man sperm is messed up. Old men produce low quality sperm.
The same way a fat woman is more likely to produce genetically defected children, an old man's sperm will cause the same.

No it doesn't.

People themselves are supposed to be smart enough to not do those kinds of things.
Society of government shouldn't be the ones.

I remember there was a quote about the best civilizations being the ones who are most disciplined. Because they don't need a big government.

lol
The reason Islam has spread is because of conquest. Bloody conquest and forced conversion.

The only reason why someone is a muslim or religious at all is because they are low IQ.

I understand that people need religion to keep them from being degenerates and also some people need a 'reason' to exist.
But you can't deny Islam is a big issue.
Most other religions are okay because they are peaceful, but islam only keeps the lesser IQ alive and doesn't give woman a choice to reproduce.

Not really.
A smart person doesn't need religion to live a happy fulfilling life.
A smart person needs a house.

If you have a dumb person without religion, it is really likely that person became an atheist not because he can reason, but he became an atheist because of 'fashion.'
Dumb atheists are more likely to be leftist in nature and advocate for socialism and 'peacefulness.' These kinds of things breed peafowlism.
Dumb atheists are trying to replicate intelligence, but just end up making it worse in their lives.
They end up druggies, whores, addicts, or any other type of degeneracy.

I think Christianity is the best religion out there to prevent degeneracy, or peafowlism.

lol any other religion meant to do that is a political ideology.
Communism, Socialism. Hippies. All these things were created to control the masses.

No.
The best way to have a higher IQ people is to effectively exterminate the lower IQ.

This however is immoral.

It is if in the wrong hands.
Also it violates people's liberties.

^Sterilization is a humane alternative to extermination. I personally don't believe that liberty should extend to reproduction which affects too many people. Bringing a new human to life is an important event that creates a new individual. Hence it needs to be reviewed by the society before it can proceed.

First, sterilisation is genocide. Second, ... wait, there is no second.

Liberty can only be taken away if you take someone's liberty away.
Such as murder, kidnapping, stealing, etc.

Forced sterilization is a violation of liberties.

We wouldn't be in this situation if tax-payers weren't paying for welfare.
Paying for their food, homes, schools.
Before welfare if a family had more than enough children, they would starve to death, just the way it should be.
It is highly irresponsible to have children and not be able to support them.

Because of welfare, irresponsible parents have more children than responsible parents. The responsible parents are taxed to pay for the irresponsible parents.