I really couldn't care less if players labelled me elitist on this game, especially the forum lesbian.

I feel so honoured I am mentioned in a thread without even having said anything.....

All clans are invite only. You can't join a clan without being invited.

Really, it is just a matter of what your standards are.

I feel so honoured I am mentioned in a thread without even having said anything.....

He was talking about lawlz. Not everything on WL forums is about you. Gosh!

YA... wait a second, i see what you did there...

YAPTT (yet another pulsey trolling thread)

Or ps trolling thread ;)

yet another bs post.

I feel so honoured I am mentioned in a thread without even having said anything.....

If I wanted to subtly refer to you I'd say something about X and your boobs. This was clearly directed at our other forum lesbian.

Will you guys leave my wife out of this!!!!!

also curious as to the statistics of lesbians on this forum? I wonder if there are more homosexual women vs heterosexual women that play :D

Your enquiry will be made harder by the fact that the line isn't so thick as you would make it out to be. A lot of us might be still exploring our sexuality or be clearly bisexual in the case that we just happen to be with the person whom we are with not singularly on a sexual attraction but because of the sum of that person

Will you guys leave my wife out of this!!!!!

The follow statement by Gentlemen has confused me and lead me to hypothesize the following scenarios:

A. He's married to Aranka's boobs

B. He's married to Aranka

C. Gentlemen's wife is a frequenter of this forum and possibly lesbian

D. He's married to X

E. He's married to Lawlz

F. Gentlemen is in a polygamous relationship and all the above scenarios are true

To Aranka's statement: Acting and exploring your sexuality is a luxury afforded to a stable society and people are easily molded by their experiences and environment. At the same time, there seems to be cases where people are hardwired into a certain preference that goes against anything they should have gathered from their environment, which may imply a genetic predisposition.

So to your point, the line each person draws is different; yours may be blurred, while other's are very clear. Lawlz's is probably just lonely and trying to broaden the spectrum of people who will communicate with him.

*edited some minor typographical errors, credit goes to Riya for pointing it out, which is the only time Riya pays any attention to my posts I daresay

Edited 5/5/2014 21:55:54

Well the true meaning of my words cannot be revealed.

However, I do find it likely that my wife frequents these forums as an intelligencer of my computer. Ever the watchful eye may be lurking beyond the veil to intersect the communes of the otherwise mundane ineptitudes of my wireless procrastinations. Therefore while not directly typing her Sauron like glare is ever upon the pages intertwined into our writing.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2003361/

^
It's gone too far when people start talking about aborting a 'gay fetus'.

D. He's married to X

D. He's married to Lawlz

Wait, these options are the same?

X = Lawlz?

If you read it you would understand. It says that your sexuality is influenced even before birth. So a homosexual fetus is believable

I'm going to bio-engineer my future child to become an Ubermensch and then tell him we come from a long line of viking warlords and the berserker gene was awakened in him.

If I marry an Asian women I might say Samurai or maybe a South African woman and claim he's from a long line of ancient Zulu warrior priests, the list goes on...

Manipulating our children's genes will be the new fashion by the time we become parents.

Lawlz a gay fetus is impossible. Influenced is not the same as being. The hormones that affect our brain chemistry with relation to its structure and function are largely affected by the environment of the mother and the genetics of the developing fetus. Sexual orientation is generally not set until the age of 3. While a choice being involved is more or less a ridiculous concept, so is a homosexual fetus.

http://www.babycentre.co.uk/a1014303/the-science-behind-sex-selection

Posting one link that supports your view of the world is called cherry-picking. Especially when it's guttural nonsense with little scientific backing. The news is there to provide a snippet of information, if you really want to learn something read a book.

(I still haven't read through all the stuff Aranka posted last time, but learning a lot. For all the crap she gets here, at least she's sharing some decent material)

Edited 5/6/2014 02:36:32