<< Back to Warzone Classic Forum   Search

Posts 21 - 40 of 63   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>   
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/20/2012 18:22:02


szeweningen 
Level 60
Report
Lol, good idea Arun, but very poor execution. A tournament like that should be invitation only (Gui made one like that, but it was a huge RR with 15 day boot so it failed). Sorry to be blunt, but looking at who joined I don't see a single person who would be top 32 1vs1 warlight player at the moment... If you want I can share with you my invite list and suggest 50-60 nicknames, then it'd make more sense I think.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/20/2012 18:42:34


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
I have reduced the number of wild cards down to 8; 1 place now remains.

@Sze, thanks and yes; I'd like to see who you have to offer. Would you be interested in playing?
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/20/2012 19:11:01


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
OK, there are going to be a few changes to this to make it work.

This tourney will be invitation only; only the best will get in as regular players. Wild cards will be judged by the Anonymous Judge, a top player who can accurately judge a book by its cover. It should be a good system. All of the current wild cards will be analysed, some may stay while others may be kicked. Also, the wild cards will only be added when all the regular places are filled so that as many top players as possible can get in-I'd like fewer then 8 wild cards.

If you wish to considered as a wild card, post here.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/21/2012 16:46:06


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
By the way, here is a link to the new tournament: http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?TournamentID=3252
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/21/2012 17:01:26


J Russell Mikkelsen 
Level 4
Report
There aren't enough wild cards. You need way, way more wild cards.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/21/2012 17:08:30


Ironheart
Level 54
Report
What are wildcards for anyway?
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/21/2012 17:15:43


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
Just to spice it up, and give a chance of a shock victory (not the whole tourney, maybe just a game). And J Russel, there probably will be more once the top players have all joined; the gaps will be filled. So far there are two wild cards.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/21/2012 18:02:47

JSA 
Level 60
Report
It looks like you have some top guys interested in this so I'd like to join as well :) I'm in the top 20 in the ladder so can you invite me?
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/21/2012 19:27:30


[WG] Warlightvet 
Level 17
Report
does beating the anonymous judge (yes, i took risks and got lucky, but isn't that what wild cards are all about) qualify me? B)
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/21/2012 20:09:30


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
@Warflowvet yes, you do qualify. Wild cards will be added after all the top players join though, so that as many top players can get in as possible. I invited two wild cards just to be sure that there would be some, but you are top of the list to get in when the top players have all joined/declined.

@JSA, the anonymous judge will give his/her opinion and I'll use that to see whether you get in. If not as a top player, you should be good enough to be a wild card.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/22/2012 00:44:04


Clifford The Big Red Dog 
Level 37
Report
I would like to be a wild card, cant usually beat those people, but i have had my lucky games where i have beat a couple of them
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 10/22/2012 18:01:06


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
Thanks for applying; you will be considered, and if taken, added after all the top players have.

I had to remake again; one, to make an autoboot (10 days) so that the tourney will end for certain, and two, to make it practice so that myhand's stats won't be affected.

I'll post a link soon.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 11:22:11


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?TournamentID=3259

Going well so far^^

Who do you think will win?
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 11:24:05


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
3 Apex are still in and 3 Wms. Could it be a clan only final?
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 12:00:31


Wally Balls 
Level 59
Report
a tournament with such a title cannot take place if i am not in it. in fact it should just be a 32 person tournament of the best players to see who plays me a one game match at the end, so i don't waste my time.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 13:02:04


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
Billy a lot of players don't consider you good enough for this tourney, and it started before you started posting on the forums.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 13:16:25


Wally Balls 
Level 59
Report
a lot of players are clueless then
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 13:17:37


Wally Balls 
Level 59
Report
. The winner gets the title of 'MASTER OF STRATEGIC 1v1' and all the bragging rights that go with it.


I already have that title and I wont be giving it up to anybody who gets lucky in one tournament I didn't even play in.
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 16:08:29


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
I have nothing to say to you Billy except give up. The winner of THIS tourney will be unofficial Strategic 1v1 Master. You are a an official Master of Delusion and Insanity, as well as being the best definition of absolute hubristicity I have seen in exactly 48 seconds of amateur psychology. I'm sure X would agree with me.

Since you probably don;t know what Hubris is, here is a handy Wikipedia link :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubris
Strategic 1v1 Masters: 12/30/2012 16:11:27


Addy the Dog 
Level 62
Report
best definition of absolute hubristicity


There is no definition of "hubristicity" since that is not a word that exists.

I don't know why you felt the need to turn a word that was already a noun into even more of a noun.
Posts 21 - 40 of 63   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>