to be honest level isn't related to skill or the time you play WL. If you play lotteries you will level up quickly without get good.

I'm so good at lotteries.

Anyone who thinks levels are equivalent to skill is flawed.

Edited 12/4/2014 13:24:45

Edited 12/4/2014 18:28:00

It should say how many coins players have earnt on their profile, if they have played any coin games.

I'm so good at lotteries.

Do you have a time machine or something? You can't be good at lotteries, its just luck XD

I'm so good at lotteries.

Me too! I don't play them.

If I stumble upon some free coins I would be happy to feed the sharks. I think there are a lot of people who are not good enough to want to risk playing open seat coin games but will probably gamble with their friends. Anything that helps earn the site money is good for all of us.

Some people forget that they do not have to play coin games.
If you don't like it, don't play.

A fish can turn into a shark, it will fight other sharks.
May the strongest get rich!
I like it.

Just dropped by Warlight and wow, Warlight 3.0, I'm definatly going to have to try this Warlight money stuff haha, who wants to play me?

Will payments in Bitcoin be accepted? Highly recommended!

For the fish-vs-shark problem, instead of making a long profit-formula,
players who lose a (coin)game can be paired up against each other and players who win can be paired up against each other, as long as only the last game is counted and bet-size is the same for these games players won't try to game the system, lower and higher skill players will still play each other, and the system will not be a pure shark-fish-pyramidn anymore.

(Such system should not replace other (not match-made) coin-games.)

Edited 12/5/2014 17:21:43

Well, of course people don't have to play these games, that is not the point. But, IF Fizzer is using this as a method to keep the game afloat financially, he has to make it long term viable. That is why we are talking about sharks and fish. If that is not the point of this (to pay for the site long term), then it doesn't really matter if this feature dies off.

This new game type is because game creator win money. In a game, all players paid coins and the winner gets the 90% of total coins. The other 10% where goes to?._.

Edited 12/5/2014 18:07:24

itìs pretty fun though, that EVERY player isn't good enough, want paired top player with other top player (shark)...

gnuff's flat:

gnuff's latest purchase:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjAnMu218l0

The other 10% where goes to?._.

To pay for a game you are too cheap to pay for

For the fish-vs-shark problem, instead of making a long profit-formula,
players who lose a (coin)game can be paired up against each other and players who win can be paired up against each other, as long as only the last game is counted and bet-size is the same for these games players won't try to game the system, lower and higher skill players will still play each other, and the system will not be a pure shark-fish-pyramidn anymore.

(Such system should not replace other (not match-made) coin-games.)

I like this idea a lot its simple yet very effective.

This could even go one step further. lose/lose is matched up with lose/lose if any are available, if none are available lose/lose will just matchup with a lose. Same goes for win/win.

Edited 12/5/2014 22:14:31

^ +1