It's not a tantrum, I'm just done. There's nothing to counter hard-headed people like Myhand and his parrot

Can I ask a follow up question, Mr. Fall?

When you say you are just done, do you mean that even if we lynch no one or someone else; you still don't intend to participate in the rest of the game in interaction or voting?

And in all fairness, I don't recall anyone saying you were a wolf just because you backed me.(^^ok, so Seahawks did basically say that, but that doesn't really count because he is running his own special form of not participating in this game.)

I believe that what myhand said was,
Okay, I encourage the lynching of Mr.Fall.
Day 1 when Semi exposed himself so brilliantly Mr.Fall said "shrugs, makes sense". But he didnt vote. In fact he delayed his vote while it was still unclear wether me or Semi would take the fall.
Now he comes out voting against me.

So I guess my request to you is if you are a villager, please at least try to defend yourself. I personally think myhands case against you is weak, but I'd really like you to tell us why.

When you say you are just done, do you mean that even if we lynch no one or someone else; you still don't intend to participate in the rest of the game in interaction or voting?

Sure, if that's even possible I'll continue. But there's nothing in my defense, in fact I think there's more against me than anything. And between you and myhand theres more support with him.

Myhand against me = village against me

Not really..cue all see Myhand is an ass. But you for once need to grow some balls and face up to us. Defend yourself.

About 12 hours left.

Anyone up for a lurker lynch? I don't really like the 'cases' on any of the four currently with votes.

Too late imo.

Vote nubs, the votes on the top of the page are still accurate...

EDIT: Jesuslight and Uzumaki Naruto will die of inactivity today if they don't vote.

Edited 12/21/2014 17:28:35

VOTE NO LYNCH

Voting for a no lynch is not in the interests of the village.

Vote: Little Blue

i vote obama

If you feel that way, why not join in the discussion about it? You suggested a shot-in-the-dark lynch, which definitely isn't in our best interest. I'm still waiting for someone to explain why, being ahead, it's in our best interest to likely burn through villagers at double the rate that we're required to.

Lynching villagers just for the sake of lynching means our seers get half as many turns to identify the witches.

Edited 12/21/2014 18:41:58

Vote : Little blue

Le sigh

18 players. Assuming 6 witches, that's 12 villagers/heroes/seers.

1 hero and 1 witch dead, so we have 5 witches left, vs 11 townies. Advocating a blind lynch means we'll lynch a town-aligned player 11/16, or 68.75% of the time. Add to that the chance of exposing another seer or hero and giving that target to the witches.

How is that supposed to be helpful?

Edited 12/21/2014 19:07:11

It was explained Little Blue. Lynching is he only way we have to kill the witches. If we don't lynch we can't win.

Lynching also gives us information. Who voted for who? When did pressure increase or decrease on certain people and why etc. Voting No Lynch is a waste of time, it does nothing for us.

Lynching is the only way we have to kill witches, but not the only way we have to gain information. You advocated a blind lynch, which almost 70% of the time will hurt the village.

In a blind lynch, you get no information based on who voted for who, since everybody is just guessing.

Without being able to change votes, you also can't increase pressure on people just to see how they act, then take your vote off.

Voting no lynch does one very important thing, it gives us more turns for our seers to verify witches. We have to lose 1 townie every day/night period, but lynching just to lynch means a 70% chance that we lose 2.

If we try to force a lynch, we also risk outing another seer, which would cut our ability to gather verified information in half.

Edited 12/21/2014 19:13:50

Votes:
Ace Windu - Little Blue
Arun - Mr. Fall
A Talking Fan - Little Blue
Dr. Stupid - Arun
Kellen the Conquerer - Dr. Stupid
Little Blue - NO LYNCH
Mr. Fall - Myhandisonfire
Myhandisonfire - Arun
Seahawks - Dr. Stupid

Total counts:
Arun - 2
Dr. Stupid - 2
Little Blue - 2
Mr. Fall - 1
Myhandisonfire - 1
NO LYNCH - 1

Yet to vote:
Dom365
GeneralGror
His balls.
Jesuslight
John Smith
Mayor Sonnen
Uzumaki Naruto

Three-way tie at the moment. xD

Ace, you seem like you're just trying to get a villager lynched, or force a claim. You suggested a blind lynch, which is statistically a very bad idea, and you are trying to make me look bad for what I've proposed, rather than attempt to refute what I've said about not lynching.

So your plan is to sit and wait? Stop with the blind lynch stuff, I vote based on what people say, I don't just throw a dart at a list.

Do you plan on No-lynching until myhand sees a witch? What if myhand isn't even a seer? Shall we twiddle our thumbs as we're picked off one by one?

Stop with the blind lynch stuff, I vote based on what people say, I don't just throw a dart at a list.

Anyone up for a lurker lynch? I don't really like the 'cases' on any of the four currently with votes.

A lurker lynch would be a blind lynch. You admitted you don't like the cases against those who already have votes, but you don't propose any case yourself. You just want to lynch, because... lynch.

I've gone over my idea for what we should do, are you reading the thread or not? Clearly not, as every one of your questions are answered by my previous posts.