... You forget Estonians being non-Indo-Europeans. Also, I'm GLAD to see Englishmen off of this list!

yeah and Turks if we can consider them in Europe.

With wider definitions of Europe, Georgian and Azerbaijani aren't Indo-European either. (However I don't personally consider these countries as part of Europe). (Also, there may be a chance of Georgian being Indo-European, but it isn't confirmed).

Edited 4/19/2015 19:24:51

no Georgians are not indo-european, actually Basques and Georgians share some strange similarities genetically and linguistically speaking.

Edited 4/19/2015 20:03:03

It's a theory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartvelian_languages#Higher-level_connections

yes true only a theory, some linguists even include those 2 languages into a superfamily of languages known as the Nostratic family (including Caucasian, Basque, Chinese, many amerindian languages as well as siberian, dravidian and eurasiatic). That would mean 99% of the world population X) Pretty useless

Edited 4/19/2015 20:14:07

Excuse me, I meant to say Georgians have borrowed words from Indo-Europeans, not that they could be Indo-Europeans.

Kurdish is an Iranian language, we're indo-european, and "we" (the language and culture) origin from Iran.

Also, all non-indo-european languages are FAR untermensch in Europe.

Example:

------------- TURKISH INFERIORITY -------------------------

Turkey, a group of horse fuckers, who invaded - and ruined - the Balkan and MENA.

Under Ottoman rule, Syria,Iraq,Egypt,Saudi Arabia all suffered from technological backwardsness.

Unlike before Seljuk/Turkish/Ottoman rule, where the arabians and persians had prospored in; Literature,medicine and engineering.

The turks ruined 2 regions, and they look like mongols.

Edited 4/20/2015 12:33:07

^ So you are not part of the "Master-Race".

Turks actually let the region they controlled prosper with wealth, scientific advances and education. Not to mention, a great military system!

Turks were backward.

Indo-Europeans are the master race.

Indo-European supremacy!

^

Indo-European Supremacy! (cept jews. jews r awesome.)

Jews aren't a race, though.

yes, they are.

im a proud america zionist!

im a proud america zionist!

Isn't that exactly like saying "I'm a proud American Nazi!"???

Oh please, Tyrion. Jews are NOT a race. Judaism is a religion. Your race is defined by your genetics, not your religion. That is like saying Islam is a race, which it isn't.

Best ethnicity: Nostratic

Best ethnicity: Kurdish.

Your race is defined by your genetics

- And that is why races are a 1940's thing.

I like the term ethnicity better, as you can prove persons' ethnicites, other than their skin colour.

Ethnicity = Culture + language + identity

Nationalism = Culture + Language + lack of identity

Also, zionism/nationalism/fascism are all shit.

All forms of nationalism, are useless, other than when you're fighting a civil war. And even when fighting a civil war, they can stand in the way of propserity,co-existence and in general, just a brighter future between different cultures.

"Patriotism is a lively sense of collective responsibility
Nationalism is a silly cock crowing on its own dunghill and calling for larger spurs and brighter beaks. I fear that nationalism is one of England's
many spurious gifts to the world." - Richard Aldington

Edited 4/20/2015 15:05:02