Those who don`t frequent the forum probably don`t know what it is about (or at least haven`t seen the discussions)

what the heck! Changed map, When was that on the cards?

This isn't Randy Ficker..... The guy making a game for his friends..... This is Fizzer trying to make money and losing all respect the community had for him!

Yeah the 100 people who are active on the forums should have a say in all changes for the site!!

This is what Fizzer said in post #1 on here:

I think it is time to bring these two templates up to date with the rest of the site and make them pure skill. However, doing this would change the auto games and ladders, so I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on the subject.

He asked for community opinion, but he never stated how that would be used (whether it would sway him)

Then said this a couple pages in:

I agree, I like the risk management aspect too. Deciding whether to attack a 2 with 3 or 4 adds strategy to the game and is fun. But at the same time, WarLight has been moving towards no-luck settings as a whole, and the risk management that comes from randomness might have to be a casualty of that (at least, as far as the ladders go.)

There is still risk management even in 0% SR, it's just a different kind of risk management.

Edited 9/28/2015 23:54:45

OK, I just went through all 9 pages and re-counted (since I don't trust the math of some people on here and some comments are yes to some things and not others):

On the question SR vs WR on 1v1 ladder ONLY:

YES - 11
NO - 27
Maybe - 9

So of those with a definite YES or NO, %71 want so keep WR, %29 want SR.



I did not tally the 2v2 ladder questions, but almost EVERYONE wants more picks and wants %16 luck gone (majority wanted SR also).

Again, Fizzer never made any promises, so it is hard to know what his threshold on NO was to keep him from making the change to SR.

Edited 9/29/2015 00:13:58