For your entertainment, a comedy of errors:

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=10207514

I knew 4 out of his 5 starts to begin, and had good position, so I should have won anyway, but an error early gave me a scare. My opponent had a few as well...

Enjoy the incompetency!

The way he expands is 10/10.

Remember always hit a 2 neutral with a 1 and then a 2, doing it with a 3 attack is a waste of armies.

A+ for effort though.

When you attack with 1 then a 2, Buns, you wind up with no armies left, but when you attack with 3 there's an army leftover. 3 armies are used to attack in either case. What are your thoughts on that?

I think unless bun's is trolling think he's referring to one extra delay?

Should you be attacking with mostly 1's + 2's or three's or is it mostly situational?

Edited 1/4/2016 00:06:03

Buns is trolling.

Luna, this is a basic formula for attacking neutrals

3 -> 2   = 2
1 + 2 -> = 1

Basically, if you attack a 2 with a 3, then 2 armies are left, and if you attack with a 1 and a 2, 1 army is left. It is more beneficial to attack with 3s, instead of a 1 and a 2.

If possible, you should always try to take any territory with one hit. It saves more armies for future use that way.

@Ox

Thanks for the explanation but my question was fairly terrible I already knew that. :)

What I mean to ask is if You always attack with 3 then they'll be a fair amount of 2's left on the map so would it be fair to say when expanding for every 2-3 attacks on a 2 neutral with 3 you generaly have 1 attack on a 2 neutral with 1 and 2.

(Actually ignore this its all situational)

Buns forgot a smiley face. It was sarcasm. :-)

I haven't thought about that though, using a 1 then a 2 adds a delay, I'm not sure why I didn't think about that before, but that's very useful to know, thanks Buns :)

I don't even know where to... The game... The posts in this thread... I... What...?