My secret? Practise.

He has his father's nack for war and strategy.

House Lannister for rulers of Westeros!

Hey no matter what I have the up most respect for you. Either way it takes a lot of dedication, effort, and thinking to get a now 96% winning percentage, and the #1 spot on the 1 v 1. But I am a statistics guy, and I can tell you it doesn't take a significance test to tell you that when the next best guys have 70% winning percentages, something is up. Do you think your percentage will drop as your are forced to play other more highly ranked players? Or will your dominance continue? How about a few tips for a simpleton such as myself?

What The Hound says is right: he's likely an alt.

He has such a high win percentage, because he learnt how to play, and experienced the learning curve by himself on another account, and when he got to a stage where he can beat most people, he started this Tyrion Lannister account, and showed what win%s would look like, without the learning curve of losing so many times involved.

If Szeweningen wasn't known for being against alt/smurf accounts I'd suspect it was sze. The account responded to Sultan in Polish, and I can't think of any other Polish players able to dominate the RT ladder to such an extent.

His 'polish' response looks like google translated (incorrect grammar, and not even an ł in Sułtan), second one is russian (also google translate), and he has UK flag. Can be anyone.

Edited 3/18/2016 20:25:56

^ 'Anyone' who can get 1st on two ladders

His flag changes every few days.

It was Netherlands, then UK, then German, then US, then UK again.

VPN?

I always thought it was the guy from GG who got banned for cheating with coins.

The flag whenever I have looked is from the UK.

Anyway congratulations on #1.

Latnox is polish. There are plenty of polish players capable of #1

Capable of #1 isn't at all saying much about that accounts consistency.

https://www.warlight.net/LadderGames?ID=3&LadderTeamID=11594

32-3 on RT ladder.

There are not "plenty" of people capable of that.

Latnox on RT ladder was 37-9.

91.4% on ladder is significantly higher than 80.4% on a ladder.

Specifically a difference between good opponents. Latnox went 12-7 vs people over 1800. Tyrion went 10-1.

So Latnox 25-2 vs people under 1800, very similar to Tyrion's 22-2, but vs. good players Tyrion kept up that same winrate against better players, whereas Latnox fell off, hard.

Tyron's a much stronger 1v1 player than Latnox. Maybe not a stronger strat 1v1 player, but definitely a stronger 1v1 player.

RT ladder means nothing In win rates I'm sure mod will agree with me, it's just having a low sd and a high rating,

That's a silly argument.

You're 12-10 vs. 1800+ opponents in your most recent page of games. That's not more impressive than 10-1 just because your rating is higher and your SD is lower.

I, and I believe most other people, would consider Trueskill Mean to mean far more than rating.

Your whole argument seems silly to me, ratings for defeated opponents doesn't matter shit when it comes to comparing two #1 imo.. You will get a better idea of skill by looking at the games (haven't looked at either so dunno who I would rate higher)

Small sample size...

Who's that faggot? Another 20game win and stall the hell out of it?

Common consensus is actually that it's you.

You don't appear to be stalling though.