That's not Knyte's alt. Knyte is not a fascist supporter.

Mr. knyte's subconscious maybe.

Edit: How's your relationship with your parents, MGSB? Are they libertarian extremists, or have you cut ties with them already?

Edited 5/17/2016 07:48:08

u should consider challening ur beliefs smedley

under what circumstances would u consider ur belief system wrong?

do u think that ur belief system is wrong and are u in a position to change it?

under what circumstances would u change ur beliefs?

and if u keep on ignoring me then it shows that u cant argue for shit ^.^

I am Anarcho-Capitalist Mr Knyte's alt

Anarcho-Capitalism and Anarcho-Socialism are so backwards, people defending it are defending subservience and enslavement of individuals, through corporations for the Capitalists, and through states for the Socialists.
Real Anarchists have no particular political ideology preference, that's why Major isn't a real Anarchist, but a pure capitalist defending corporations and even sometimes leaning toward the worst socialist ideologies when he goes against meritocracy.

Edited 5/17/2016 11:18:03

MGSB doesn't answer because he cannot say anything that wouldn't either be admitting being wrong or making him look like an idiot.

Panda, die. You say nonsense with no basis of fact just to sound edgy. Corporations are government made. And yes Anarcho-capitalists are real anarchists, they are for the emancipation of folk from the state.

I'll change my views when the oceans boil over and hell freezes.

Edited 5/17/2016 13:36:23

The Lord, maybe I just don't ostracize other folk for opinions, even if those opinions cause evil. They're not police killing folk and enforcing evil, so no they're not so far gone like you.

What?? You don't cut ties with your parents even though they don't believe the Anarchist / Anarcho-Capitalist / whatevz gospel? Then you are at direct odds with Crazy Stefan. In fact, he would want to personally shoot you in the head for supporting the State by your inaction.

Stefan Molyneux advocates disassociating with abusive families. What is wrong about that?

Corporations are government made.

Not necessarily, corporatist oligarchies and monopolies are the direct result of some people abusing their influence and being against the perfect competition model, try to find a just middle, you are too extreme in your views.

And yes Anarcho-capitalists are real anarchists, they are for the emancipation of folk from the state.

They aren't real anarchist at all, they are certainly for the emancipation of the people from states, but they aren't necessarily for the emancipation of folk from oligarchies and corporatism. If we could give credit to anarchism (and personally I am not in favor of it since it is as utopian as Marxism could be), we can then say anarcho-capitalism is as flawed as anarcho-socialism, since both of them are advocating for the emancipation of folk but are not complete in their ideologies since the first one forgets to mention they are not against oligarchy/corporatist emancipation and the second one is not necessarily against an emancipation from the state at all.

Edited 5/17/2016 13:58:08

Supporting some subset of state expenditures and thus tax collection = abuse?? Sounds like something a cultist might say. Just watch the video, it's quite entertaining.

Corporations are legal fictions created by the State to shield executives from liability… It’s like if I had a little hand-puppet, and I went to rob a bank, and the hand-puppet held the little gun and told people to hand over all the money, and then the hand-puppet grabbed the money and ran out, and then I got caught and I handed the hand-puppet over the police and then the police tried the hand-puppet, put the hand-puppet in jail, and I get to keep all the money.

Stefan Molyneux advocated disassociating if you were abused, I don't know where you're getting this from.

A rather simplistic view, the State is not responsible alone of it, deregulation and being against antitrust laws encouraged the emergence of big corporations abusing from their proeminent place in the market generating many barriers of entry to the market, since without these necessary laws, abuses are legion (as I explained you earlie in a chat).

Except corporations in America were created while regulation increased exponentially.

Stefan Molyneux advocated disassociating if you were abused, I don't know where you're getting this from.

Are you too afraid to watch the video because it might expose your hero as something less than admirable? And crush a part of your world view?

Crazy Stefan thinks that if I support the concept of state in some form, and thus taxes, then this means that I want you shot if you don't pay taxes. There is nothing between being an Anarcho-Capitalist and wanting bloodshed in Crazy Stefan's world.

Another interesting thing about Stefan is that he doesn't believe in intellectual property, however that doesn't prevent him from abusing DMCA notices to silence his critics. Don't do as I do, just do as I say.

Edited 5/17/2016 14:12:16

Another interesting thing about Stefan is that he doesn't believe in intellectual property, however that doesn't prevent him from abusing DMCA notices to silence his critics. Don't do as I do, just do as I say.

They were doxxing folk in those videos.

Crazy Stefan thinks that if I support the concept of state in some form, and thus taxes, then this means that I want you shot if you don't pay taxes. There is nothing between being an Anarcho-Capitalist and wanting bloodshed in Crazy Stefan's world.

Alright so what do you want to happen? Me put in gaol. And if I resist? I get shot

Except corporations in America were created while regulation increased exponentially.

Well I would expect more than a simple sentence to explain your point here.

Suppressing all the laws even the ones defending perfect competition such as the Antitrust laws would encourage an enormous amoral multinational megacorporation or conglomerate with powers (oligarchy) which are usually held by governments which values profits over ethics and life, but ultimately creates infinitely more harm than good (see the Economic Theory about Evil Corporation). By your position that you are currently defending, it would basically lead to another form of subservience not from the state but by a mega-corporation that would exist without laws defending a perfect and fair competition between companies and businesses.

Edited 5/17/2016 14:27:48

A government cannot be created from it's composite parts like you are proposing. This state would have infinite hardships attempting to corner markets like protection, various infrastructure markets, and folk who've had freedom and are willing to defend it.

They were doxxing folk in those videos.

YouTube is actually very strict when it comes to doxxing. They would have taken the videos down if there really was any doxxing going on. The truth is that there was no doxxing, and the self-professed Anarcho-Capitalist used copyright notices to take down perfectly legal videos that were simply giving him criticism that he couldn't refute.

Alright so what do you want to happen? Me put in gaol. And if I resist? I get shot

Yes, jail. If you resist violently and the police has no choice but to shoot you, then you being dead is not a result of you not paying taxes but you being violent to the police.

And let me point out that the police, the fire brigade, and state run hospitals save millions of lives every year. So by opposing taxes, you are advocating killing millions of people every single year. What a monster! For the benefit of everyone, please consider suicide.