^Nope. Nazi Germany was a pro-family and pro-ethnicity caninist entity

They committed acts against radic religious groups, that is felinism.

About Points 11 and 12, newborn infants should be named by the state without a family name.

So the state now owns a ever growing section of the population. The state also owns the entire world, so they have unlimited resources. Everyone is taught by the government, so they have no choice in political opinion, and will vote for who the government tells them to, which will of course be the in-control party.

There is literally no checks and balances on the abuse of state power at this point, so what will stop your one world state from abusing as it wants, and giving kick backs to a small part of society that controls it? What would stop it from taking away the few rights you want for folk, pressing some religion onto the folk, or executing them for simple abuses? I'm waiting for the answer, Equality 7-2521.

^Because family power must be removed using any peaceful and legal method.

That's like someone asking me: "How would you prevent harmful monopolies from forming in Ancapistan"

And me answering: "The state needs to be dismantled"

That's ignoring the question, so again, how will you prevent abuses of power?

3

^By having multiple political parties and fair elections

The state has unlimited power over children's education in their formative years, so they can tell them one party is good and to vote for it. The children will be indoctrinated, and the other parties will die out from lack of votes and membership.

Also extremist movements from any side are decimated by children removal to make sure that extremism is not hereditary.

Children would be removed by the state, folk who control the state could simply just not remove their own children and become a privileged class.

Mine:
1. N
2. N
3. U
4. N
5. N
6. U
7. N
8. Y
9. N
10. Y
11. N
12. Y
13. N
14. N
15. N
16. N
17. N
18. N
19. N
20. U
21. N
22. N

for a bunch of these answer should be the other way around for Islam?

I don't think so, most of these are backed up by the Quran and if not, I took what Egyptian Muslims said.

1: No
2: No
3: Unsure
4: No
5: Yes
6: Yes
7: Yes
8: No
9: Yes
10: Unsure
11: No
12: No
13: No
14: No
15: No
16: No
17: No
18: No
19: Yes
20: Yes
21: No
22: Unsure

Final Score:7.5/22

Just barely not an Infidel. Yay?

^^What about let humans and robots share power?

Robots? Really? This is ridiculous, but well I have little better to do, so here it is:

Robots should also make sure that humans can not break the law no matter how powerful they can be

Unless it's illegal to teach anything in relation to politics, this doesn't make indoctrination not a problem. The teachers can teach that robots are oppressive and so the eventual voters will vote against the robot guard in the referendum, and state aligned humans will take over.

^Nothing related to political parties should be taught. Instead how the state works should be taught in an unbiased way.

Then populism and guard-hate will take over, and the anti-robot bloc will rise and vote against the robots.

Jesus (was God's son), what're you talking about? The family's role and command, or sex with robots?

Jesus was an alien, which explains his miracles and powers.

Racism against robots and the core family

^I don't think populism will take over. Instead there will always be a bunch of STEM people siding with robots unless robots are really mad.

These folk have little knowledge of political ideologies, and are going to attach to whatever "good idea" they see, which will be some populist tripe most likely.

Many people keep talking about ethnic nationalism and racism no matter whether they support them or oppose them. Most do not realize that these are in essence pro-family ideologies. Felinism on the other hand, is probably the only anti-family ideology in existence now. Since almost all world ideologies from the left to the right are pro-family, we need an explicitly anti-family movement.

Stop your anti-family tripe, they aren't evil.

A FAITH BASED AROUND RED STICKS NEEDS TO EXIST BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST

^An anti-family movement needs to exist precisely because it does not exist.

We need an anti-food movement then

We need Daedra worship too

A total absence of cats needs to exist since it does not exist. Let's start gobbling up all the cats, I knew the Chinese were smart.

^No. This situation is different. In liberal democracies there are checks and balances

Which can fail spectacularly, as you see in America.

Yes there needs to be an anti-family movement to put a check on the power of families and I will establish this movement.

Yes there needs to be an anti-food movement, to put a check on the power of food and I will establish this movement.

^^You are no different from far right guys in terms of positions on family power which is unfortunate.

You are no different in terms of positions on food power which is unfortunate.

The worst enemy of a libertarian society is family power and you do not see that.

The worst enemy of a libertarian society will and always will be the state. Libertarianism is a movement dedicated to curtailing state power, not some imaginary power the family has. Screw off, you're not a libertarian.

A total absence of cats needs to exist since it does not exist. Let's start gobbling up all the cats, I knew the Chinese were smart.

Let's have a multi cultural cook off, invite your families.

Robots can have about 49% of the power while humans have about 51% so that humans can disable robots if they become insane.

Skynet alert! Skynet alert! Skynet alert!

Tabby, please watch the "Terminator" movie-series!!