Agreed the only thing that should be hidden is blatant trolling and spamming, not "trolling" - political viewpoints so extreme that they shouldn't even be considered.
No respectably delivered viewpoint (i.e. not spammed, trolled, etc.) is too extreme to consider. If a viewpoint is incorrect it is subject to opposing arguments and users may see for themselves how incorrect it is.
Censorship is only required to protect an incorrect idea that doesn't hold up to scrutiny, otherwise the truth would speak for itself.
Update 3.17 discussion: Forum voting, level liking: 9/1/2016 20:11:40
I like it. I think it's a very good idea with good execution. Good job.
I see 2 scenarios
a) Trolls will lose interest and leave b) Trolls will still care about their threads on an online risk forum, and level up alts to get their threads higher voted. In doing so: actual humans will downvote it, with more power than a person (other than Nauz; like 300 combined levels and 6 memberships) can hope to achieve, and all the time levelling up those alts inadvertently got Fizzer more moneiz because of more traffic
tl;dr gud job fizzy <3
Update 3.17 discussion: Forum voting, level liking: 9/1/2016 20:14:30
I understand the need for a forum moderation update but it is a little well... ugly =p I guess we will get used to it after a while but right now it is jarring.
Update 3.17 discussion: Forum voting, level liking: 9/1/2016 20:49:13
