I was going to get worried about a second, third, fourth, ect, term from Clinton but I realized she's unlikely to survive this one let alone the next.


She's already recovered from Pneumonia in like 8 hours (at age 70) so I'm pretty sure she can survive death.

*roasted*
LOL !!
xd
kek

rekt
kil
ded
destoryed

^
Conversations evolve, don't be a cuck and say "WELL IT'S NOT WHAT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT"

I follow Fizzer's own guidelines which are (see the [?] thing under the thumbs):

You should upvote or downvote based on whether you think the general WarLight community would find the content of this post interesting, enjoyable, or useful. Be careful not to let your own prejudices affect your voting.

In the context of the OP, I expect that most of the general WL community will find derails about Jews neither interesting, nor enjoyable, nor useful. Make another post if you want to talk about that stuff. (I doubt it will stay visible for long, though, if previous threads are any measure.)

>vegetarian
>callings eating chicken sucking cock
>mewlmao

Edited 10/15/2016 02:16:55

Fine Karl.

I will read Imperium. end to end.

This whole convo became garbage after page 1

" Come on, this was a time when alcohol was banned and when democrats supported segregation. "Historically" literally has no relevance when discussing long-term issues like this. "

1 All parties supported it at that time. 2 Hoover had actually a pretty interesting dry stance. 3, did you honestly just say that long term issues have no relation to history?. Well, I'm not gonna start screaming at you but I will have to say I respectfully disagree. History has everything to do with this. In order to understand how to solve a problem or understand an issue, you must know its origins. Besides, when I said that I was correcting Juq not talking about the current subject you were on.

History has everything to do with this.

I was referring to your claim about historical party stances, not about history in general. There is widespread agreement among political scientists that the republican and democratic party platforms have drastically changed since the 1920's, one example of this being trade.

Edited 10/20/2016 18:30:51