World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/14/2012 21:57:49 |
[WG] Warlightvet
Level 17
Report
|
except me.
ok, i know, completely irrelevant, but i couldn't resist -.-
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/14/2012 22:02:15 |
Art Vandelay
Level 54
Report
|
I'm done talking to you hedja. You even admit you don't know what you're talking about and I know for a fact that I am correct. I even go back to check my responses. If you think that the us had the largest navy your an idiot. And the fact yiu think that the us rebuilt an entire navy in a year makes you the dumbest human to ever live. Your stupidity amazes me. When you don't know what your talking about shut your mouth. Why would you continue to argue when your not even sure? Stop embarrassing yourself. Sidemote: The American navy grew into the largest in the world but your times are wrong.
How do I have a kindergarten level you idiot? I said I started then. Just shut up, and Mussolini controlled Spain? You should be instituntionalized for stupidity.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/14/2012 22:08:06 |
Art Vandelay
Level 54
Report
|
Hitter should have waited to invade Russia. Instead he should have invaded England. The genocides were simply a waste of supplies. He also tried to make numerous decisions ex: Stalingrad which was the turning point in World War Two would never have happened if not or hitler. They were simply tryin to take oil fields in the cacaus area but instead he got his armies trapped into a two year or so long battle. He then decided to sacrifice the dying army instead of Saving it. Germany should have taken England, then take Russia. Hitler should have also not been in control of the armies. He was a good face from the party and I ideals but not a strategic leader. Also I don't condon his behavior.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/14/2012 22:23:01 |
Nyan
Level 55
Report
|
:D I got you to further vilify urself (umadbro?). And I just meant that Franco's forces should be like under a small Axis power's control.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/14/2012 23:43:23 |
uga98
Level 2
Report
|
The longer hitler waited to take russia the more time stalin had to prepare. The molotov ribbentrop pact meant nothing to both leaders. Keep in mind after the spainish civil war stalin saw the need to build up a better army he was in the middle of it when hitler invaded. Had he waited until 1943 when the Russian army got up to date 1941 guns and up to date tanks into the army, it would've been a long war. Remember Britain was ready to fight to the death. And Mr Roosevelt was itching for a reason to get America into the war, I'm sure an attack on the UK would've brough us in.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/15/2012 04:12:50 |
Art Vandelay
Level 54
Report
|
I genuinely don't believe that other nations troops can compare to that of the nazis. The reason why Britain won the Battle of Britain was a few reasons, not because of a small plane superiority because the messhersmidt was a great high altitude interceptor. The real reasons for their victory were radar, the fact that they were protecting the homeland and families, and that Germany had to cease because of devastating losses. I think if they continued it would have turned into the Germans favor. But that's a matter of opinion. I also think German units were better trained, had better leadership, and moral(debatable). I think we can agree that this is between England and Germany atleast. England had there commandoes and basic grunts but the Germans had the waffen, shutzstaffel, fallshirmjäger, gebirgsjager, and other highly trained groups. Some being extremely radical, others not as much but still very loyal. Although I don't dismiss English quality I still firmly believe the Germans were the strongest force in WWII
And it's the Russians were a massive horde. Ok they had the t34 but they were never going to win by quality or strategy even if they did make a better army. It was always going to be about numbers. They had moral(which mistifies me) and numbers that was it.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/15/2012 06:18:52 |
hedja
Level 61
Report
|
O ok, I thought it was by the end of 1942, because in Midway all 4 Japanese carriers were damaged, whereas they damaged the same carrier, twice, thinking it was a different one. This one the had hit twice was also damaged earlier in the Pacific War, (not sure if Pearl Harbour or not) but was repaired. The Japanese thought they had destroyed 3 US carriers, and lied about their losses to the public.
BK, I'm saying what i think happened, you happen to think that whatever you say is 100% historically accurate and if i checked on-line not all of what you say would be true. I really can't be bothered to check Navy lists for the beginning, and anyway I'm righting an essay about how much of an influence GB was in the war on Germany, next week it'll be one on dropping the nukes, unfortunately neither need me to see numbers of Japanese fleet compared to the US.
Though we disagree on the Navy, I see we agree on that Hitler should have invaded Britain, and left another year to attack Russia at a more opportune moment. Also Japan should have invaded Siberia (Russia) instead of bringing the US into the war in 41. And to help the Germans finish of the Russians before they concentrate on fighting the US.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/15/2012 21:10:08 |
Art Vandelay
Level 54
Report
|
go check what i say, i make sure that i back up everyting i've said with resources. so i know all my words are 100% true. also my opinions on the nukes is a positive and i believe it was totally warranted.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/15/2012 21:51:51 |
Art Vandelay
Level 54
Report
|
i just wrote a whole paragraph and it was lost like tears in the rain because warlight lagged out. so much spaghetti everywhere out of my fanny pack
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/15/2012 22:57:36 |
Nyan
Level 55
Report
|
o-o
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/18/2012 15:44:22 |
Freedom Crusader
Level 46
Report
|
Luftwaffe fighter planes far outguned, outmanouvered and had much more speed than UK fighters.
But again Hitler was the leader of every millitary part of Germany and he wanted to bomb the british to submishion instead of fighting them whit fighter planes in the air.
The reason the british planes planes smashed the German planes 4:1 is because the German planes were light Bombers whit no defence and few excort fighters.
US lost few ships in pearl harbor totally, most of the bombed ships were up and running after just few months.
This was because the japanese man that lead the attack on pearl harbor thoug it were dishonorly to attack the undefended US naval Yards and the fuel storage(whic was planned to be bombed in a second attack wawe by the Japanese admiral, but the seconadry man that lead the attack thoug it was stupid to send a second wawe to attack when the first allred destroyed the ships).
If the Naval yards had been destroyed the US would have had to use months to repair them before they could even begin repair the ships and in this time the ships would have gotten into an even worse condition).
The fuel storage held millions of gallons of fuel and it were enough in them to drive the whole American fleet for 8 month, if this fuel had went up in flames it would have taken 2-3 years to replace it and US would have been unable to make any major moves at all.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/18/2012 21:33:43 |
Darth Mylor {Warlighter}
Level 13
Report
|
Heres what i think the major superpowers should each have.
Germany: 75
UK plus its colonies: 60
Japan: 65
USSR: 70
US: 80
These my be overpowering some people but it makes sense. Germany at that time owned much of europe, including france and some of soviet russia's former territories. Britain was very close to losing, having been recently bombed a lot. Japan had most of the pacific, but still dint have either the resources or the men. USSR, while they didnt have the best army training wise, they had a large, loyal army determined to stop germany. USA, arguably the strongest country at that time, began mass producing ships, planes, etc, as well as a fairly large armie as well. If you guys have any suggestions, just say it.
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/18/2012 23:49:41 |
Art Vandelay
Level 54
Report
|
I cannot believe that you just said "USA, arguably the strongest country at that time"
|
World War 2: 1942 scenario: 10/19/2012 00:09:34 |
Darth Mylor {Warlighter}
Level 13
Report
|
I said "arguably", meaning this is just my opinion.
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|