Here are the final templates and settings for the clan league:

1v1:
Four round robin tournament with roughly 7 people on Medium Earth:
Strategic 1v1 Template with 5 day boot

1 point for each win

2v2:
One round robin tournament with roughly 7 teams on East Asia & Oceania:
Strategic 2v2 Settings, only thing that changes is the map with 5 day autoboot

One round robin tournament with roughly 7 teams on Medium Earth:
Strategic 2v2 Settings, 5 day autoboot

2 points for each win

3v3:
One round robin tournament with roughly 7 teams on Europe:
4 starts in random warlords, 0% straight round luck, 4 armies in each starting territory

4 points for each win

wasn't 3v3 on classic Eu template? why now you change again and you put straight round?

What is the difference between Europe and Classic Eu? Which one of the two is Troll's map?

Also must the clan leader say which of the 2v2 teams is playing on each setting, or will we be able to choose?

map is the same. but i was thining was 4x5 RW 0%weighted like other time

When was it 4x5 RW 0% Weighted? Last season it was Cities distribution.

sorry didn't know it. why so we can't play the most played template: 4x5 RW 0% weighted?

The most used template by you? Or the most used template by everyone on Europe? I don't have a problem with changing it because I don't think it will make a big difference in the game. I'm guessing you just don't like the calculating with straight round?

so we could vote which template use.

I think we've had enough voting for the clan league. I'd like to just finalize it right now and go with your template.

I thought the most popular EU template was

16% luck, weighted random
Manual 4 starts, random warlords
NC

but 0% is better then 16%...

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?TemplateID=238755
template 4x5 RW 0% weighted

Thank you JSA for accepting weighted random. yes. straight round has way to much calculations involved.. that would spoil some of the fun imho and would make us feel we're at work instead of playing a game..

I think straight round has less calculations. It's definite.

3v2 succeeds, always. Why?

3 * .6 = 1.8, which rounds to 2.

It's easier to calculate what "will" work for sure, than to calculate % chances of each scenario and see which is better based on that.

you are wrong Omniscient :) of course it's EASIER to count on 0% sr, but you count less often on 0%wr, and on 0%sr every single troop maters so you count every single attack.

Omniscient, for both you can just type into the analyse attack graph and you will see percentages, that is not calculation these guys are talking about.
You know exactly how many leftovers you will have, so you must think, what will i do next turn with these leftovers, leaving me how much income for attack, where do i need to deploy, how many times do i hit with 1 to take out 1 defender, do i want more leftovers etc. etc.
On weighted, since you cannot know all these factors, you only need to decide whether you pray for luck and attack with 3vs2 or if you want to be sure and go 4vs2.

when(if) will a third clan league occur? and on what templates?

lol is already started.

Only Division A...