We can put it to where it limits on who can vote on the poll by the level a person is, the amount of games hes played, what types of games he has played in 1vs1's or any ladders etc. Also Theres always going to be a slight error in polls or anything for that matter, but its the best way to know who wants it or not and makes it obvious for the community to know what important topics we need to discuss.

We all have our opinons but excluding even lower levels or people who are just starting out in the ladder just because they may side track your opinion isnt the way to go. They may have lower experience from you but they do have ideas just like you.

Of course everyone who's able to play ladders should be able to vote. But not everyone who's level 50 (or whatever level is needed) plays on the ladder.

I just wanted to point out that many players don't know what rounding mode or luck factor means exactly. If you put a poll on the dashboard without explaination you will have players that don't vote what they wanted to vote for effectively

Then lets do exactly that, explain players what both do(if they didnt know which would be suprising because most players have created games by level 40-50 and up), maybe even show them an example of each type and let them vote from there.

Other limits would be put in place but i think you already know that

There are A LOT of high level players that don't know the difference. I could explain what the differences are, but it doesn't matter here. It's important to explain it where the poll will be placed!

Inquisitor is spamming. This is MoD's poll:

https://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/9945369-bring-the-old-1vs1-ladder-back

Edited 9/28/2015 07:22:45

Before we even start thinking of changing the ladder again. I think we should create a whole new poll to see who wants the ladder to be luck free or not that is shown not only in the forumns but also in the dashboard so many player can see the poll, me personally i say keep the new but its up to the community.

I made a poll about this. Vote if you haven't. Get more people to vote. The poll result will be published on 1 Oct 2015.
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=56069f9fe4b0148c68da6862

Poll discussion thread
https://www.warlight.net/Forum/110747-u-prefer-straight-round-weighted-random

It would be much better if the creator is willing to sticky this poll thread.

Edited 9/28/2015 05:35:28

Keep voting guys. We haven't finished yet

voted.. of course....

Booooo! Cyclic move order should be a given in ladders.. sure the old template is fun (as is the new one) but laddergames shouldn't be determined by lucky ordersequences, which they are way to often for me to be okay with.


As for 0% WR/0% SR, I don't mind either one. They are two very different ways to play/pick the map but I enjoy them about the same and both are very strategic.

To be honest i don't care too much about move order or wheter it's ME or MME. I just wrote it in uservoice so we have something concrete. If fizzer decides to make a poll he should probably leave that options open

cycle > random moves
MME>ME
0% SR > 0% WR

;)

2v2 ladder:
4 picks >2 picks

0% SR > 0% WR

3v3 ladder: enjoy it!

best update EVER!!!!!!

Edited 9/28/2015 09:45:52

I want both, old and new, to have a chance to play what I want at the moment. I get tired of bs luck, I switch from old to new, I get tired of calculations I go back to old... and with 2 active everyone is happy, no?

i first time agree with gnuff. What's next? i will try to abuse system like him? :/

^Lol.

181 votes now! we broke top ten within 17 hours and are currently on rank 8 of the uservoice with most votes.

Rank 1 of the "hottest" uservoices ;)

1v1 ladder:
cycle < random moves
MME sometimes < sometimes > sometimes = ME
0% SR < 0% WR
both are decent templates, but old > new

2v2 ladder:
4 picks > 2 picks
cycle > random moves (usually)
0% SR > 16% WR
but 0% SR < 0% WR

3v3 ladder: it would be better with 0% WR :/
cycling is annoying to pay attention to
I don't want to be an accountant

Decent update, could be better :/ I'm not a calculator.

Edited 9/28/2015 12:07:35

For those calling this a poll, stop. Polls have more than one option.

Does the 2v2 ladder have 4 starts now? I see it's still 2 in the new games

infact it didn't changed, 2 was and 2 is :P

1v1 ladder:

I think I prefer MME actually but don't feel super strongly. It does open up new possibilities though.

I am undecided on move order.

But I definitely think it should be 0% WR.