I like it how its easy possible to add stiupid pictures to the cards but neccessary changes for the game mechanic are impossible.

Because alterations to the aesthetics are very very very easy.

Changes to game mechanics on the whole are very very very hard.

Move the 3 letter abbreviation to the top right!

Ehh, I preferred the original cards :/

prefer the original but an improvement from the other new cards...

I do like the simplicity of his art style, but if simplicity is what you were going for why not keep the cards as they were?!

The new ones are now usable, but the option of choice would be nice.

Fizzer is forever trying to teach old dogs new tricks to obvious results.

P.S. Does Sam Trout play WL?

Edited 1/30/2016 15:48:02

Fleecemaster
Because alterations to the aesthetics are very very very easy.

Changes to game mechanics on the whole are very very very hard.

There are things even i could change without to have knowledge about coding and programming. I have games coded without knowlegde so i know what im talking about. And even this simple and important things the game needs, what even i could change, were ignored?

Edited 1/30/2016 17:47:52

Seeing the new new cards in-game, I would suggest the saturation of the borders be lowered (less intense colouration) as the vivid colours are quite distracting and harsh in contrast to the card images, I would maybe drop to 60% saturation, or there abouts, and an increase in brightness by about 20% :)

It would be cool if there was an option in the settings to let you use the original designs. :)

Israel: It would be cool if there was an option in the settings to let you use the original designs. :)

To be fair, that's do-able, and it would be nice if Fizzer could do that, then players get the best of both worlds (it could be a simple option for "Simple card designs")

Edited 1/30/2016 18:30:06

I dont believe that Fizzer is the one who decide what happens with the game. I expect there are already some rich hands on this game, who want to make profit.

Maybe we could use set of cards by ourselves - by account settings?

Could you give us the option to choose between the new and the old?

Suggestion for change art :

Reinforcement - include infantry!

Reconnaissance - Perhaps a sniper or guy hiding behind trees

Surveillance - Guy set up on a watchtower overlooking a town

Blockade - An organized evacuation from an area filled with traps or fortifications (find a way)

I still don't like them. The original cards looked cleaner, more appealing.

Although I still prefer the original ones, those are better than the first update, now we can distinguish them better. I'll still push for a return to the old ones, but I can live with those

Old.

Why are you making a serious strategy game seem cartoonish? Also the shortened word forms are confusing if you haven't played the game long.

great update imho, but please please please keep the names which are commonly used by players for a few years already - namely:

OP - Order Priority
OD - Order Delay

plus some of the abbreviations are indeed very misleading while could be swapped for something else - eg. reinforcement card could be labelled "ADD" which would be instantly recognized as "add +20"

why is the renforement card diffren't to the ones in game

i like both i just want to know why

Edited 2/1/2016 21:08:25

Well, after some experience with the "new" new cards i can say:

I see three cards that are red :-(

And i still prefer an option to see the old one...