Beebz, the two are comparable? Let's try to compare them.
Your teammate needed 10 minutes a turn in real-time for 80% of the 14-20 turns (I forget the total number of turns). After I eliminated you he didn't have teammates, so turns should have been quicker, not longer. I went to the bathroom and said I'd boot at 8 minutes after returning. I returned and booted him to end the madness. 3v3 Europe doesn't need 8 consecutive 10-minute turns. I don't enjoy wasting my time. This is just one game. It didn't matter to me. Having my time wasted did matter. So I ended it.
http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?GameID=3083340
Your 7000 games? About 3000-5000 were 1v1s. How many were against people who had no clue how to play on the Europe Real-life map? How many of your 1000-3000 3v3s were with stacked teams against weak teams? I could never thousands of pointless games just so my stats look pretty.
Beebz, if you are so elite, rejoin the ladders. Based on my experience with you, you aren't elite. When I first met you in 3v3 games, you had a 90%+ win rate but played as if you won 55%. Months later, I assumed you were still quite bad. So I played you as if you were bad, to make the game more interesting. But you improved and my playing at a 60% level that game for fun was not good enough to win. I congratulated you for having improved to a 65-70% level. You thought it was a great victory and added it to your favorite games. Now, we are playing in a 3v3 championship. You made many mistakes and I am playing how I usually play. You will be eliminated and your team will probably lose, all because of your bad moves against me when you had the advantage. I sometimes goof around in real-time games out of boredom. But for you to play so badly in a tournament's championship game seems to reflect your true ability. Rejoin the ladders and take the top spot and I'll admit you are elite. Until then, just enjoy your meaningless games of stacked teams against nobodies.