get out.

-3,9 from these two words. There's not much meaning to these words, and so it's very very understandish.

Edited 9/16/2016 20:55:33

Well Kapy, care to analyze my writing? I feel that since Jewburg asked, I should I quirk to my own writing. This thread has indeed peaked my interest and thus further reasoning as to my inquiry.

Well, I can accept that. Thanks.

Interesting.

I would be rather curious to know what my score is.

Well, i want to know what my score is, its kind of interesting to see mine xp.

So the top spot goes to a fascist who rarely makes sentences longer than 5 words or discusses anything complicated. Is that really a good thing?

It's really the bottom result; not the top. The test is intended to determine the rough grade level one needs to be to understand a particular material.

ie. The contents of my post, not including this sentence, scores a 6.6 on the ARI, which equates to a 5th-6th grade reading level.

The Lord's post scores 6.7, also a 5th-6th grade reading level. This is not to suggest that either he or myself write at the level expected of a fifth grader, it means that the average fifth grader should be able to comprehend the meaning of our posts.

Edited 9/17/2016 16:52:06

Mmm, www

It's really the bottom result; not the top.

Like I said, the bottom has the most understandability, but the least meaning and nuances, while the top has the least, but the most nuances. Somewhere in the lower middle I think is what writing should generally be like.

not enough kebab 6/10 good post

The fine line between a serious and a troll thread; my favorite kind. Amazing read, Juq.

Xapy, can you analyse mine? If you want some examples, tell me please.

I honestly feel 6-7 is roughly where most educated people land without attempting to be intentionally verbose. Knyte I think tends to intentionally act showy so as to be condescending, I usually don't, not do myhandisonfire or teamguns, all of whom rank around the 6-7 mark. Or at least I assume I rank around 6-7; I only checked the one post I made.

This post for example was 9.8, so I figure the sample size will determine whether some people score high or low, as their posts will vary widely.

EDIT: Seems some tools try to account for this, and require at least 100 words be entered in for it to even determine a result because it knows anything smaller is too small of a sample size.

Edited 9/17/2016 17:01:28

Upvoted this thread in the spirit of the OT Watch: https://www.warlight.net/Forum/185016-join-ot-watch

^upvote the thread!

I don't understand this. The text is too thick. ;~;

Most of my texts seem to have quite high scores actually. So is this the reason why everyone who doesn't agree with me is a retard?

Can I get an idiot's breakdown for meaning of this whole thread.

*you are